Elliott analysis of metals, oil and gas: dated series laboratory
Real dated D1 observations for gold, silver, WTI, Brent and Henry Hub: reject mechanical counts and separate 25 October 2026 scenarios from historical examples.
Published: (UTC+3)
Русский · English · Deutsch · Español · Français · Italiano · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
Choose the exact quotation before counting waves. This laboratory pairs historical tests with a frozen review dated 25 October 2026. The tables contain provider-published observations; the candidate labels and conditional branches are our educational analysis.
Fix the instrument, dates and construction of the series
D1 means the provider’s daily bar, not a globally identical UTC day. Yahoo timestamps are converted using the supplied exchange timezone; quote OHLC is used without substituting adjusted close. ChartExchange’s date column is labelled UTC and retains its Sunday observations. Investing.com date labels are retained; its session construction was not independently established. Prices are rounded for these tables and calculations; extra decimals do not establish an exchange tick size. A provider close is not automatically an official settlement or an executable quote.
GC=F, SI=F, CL=F, BZ=F and NG=F are provider futures series. Their historical roll and back-adjustment construction was not independently audited; the 2026 contract name does not identify every 2020 bar’s expiry. Resolve expiry and roll before a contract-level claim. XAUUSD/XAGUSD use a separate OTC provider table: neither its bid/ask construction nor its volume represents a verified centralized exchange feed. Volume is omitted. The historical and current cases use the same source convention for each symbol.
Can a familiar market name replace the exact symbol and session?
No. Record provider, symbol, version or expiry, units, daily session, adjustment method and observation cutoff before comparing counts.
What the historical test and current branches establish
For each new historical case, take six consecutive published bars: the first six available from 16 March 2020 for Yahoo, or the six observations ending 16 October 2026 for the shorter spot/IMOEX extracts. Test p0=L0, p1=H1, p2=L2, p3=H3, p4=L4, p5=H5 as a deliberately mechanical upward candidate. These are real bar extremes, not confirmed swing endpoints. Check retracement direction, p2>p0, p3>p1, strict ordinary-impulse non-overlap p4>p1 and wave-3 length. Compare both arithmetic and percentage moves. Waveopedia discusses rare futures overlap qualifications; this exercise uses the stated strict screen and does not turn an overlap into a proven diagonal.
Six bars never establish the required internal 5–3–5–3–5, larger-degree context or intrabar ordering. All newly tested mechanical candidates fail at least one screen; rejecting them leaves the wider count unresolved. For the frozen 25 October review, H5/L5 are the maximum high/minimum low of the last five available bars. Observe the next five completed bars from the same provider: a close above H5 prompts review of continuation versus a corrective rally; a close below L5 prompts review of a deeper correction or a different count. Record both if both occur, in observed order; no event means unresolved at the deadline. These are authored review conditions, not wave invalidation levels, trade entries, targets or estimated probabilities. This dated page does not update automatically.
Does a close outside H5/L5 prove a wave label?
No. It records the chosen condition. Verify subdivisions and context separately, and retain the other scenario and the timestamped original analysis.
Gold futures: real historical observations and a rejected candidate
The gold example uses the provider futures symbol GC=F, not XAUUSD or a gold ETF. Source: Yahoo Finance, GC=F, D1, USD per troy ounce; 2020-03-16–2020-03-23. Daily dates use America/New_York. The archive is a provider futures/index series, not a separately verified exchange record. The table tests the stated L,H,L,H,L,H candidate retrospectively; it is not a forecast issued on those dates.
For the candidate points, L1, L3, L5 = 85.60, 14.30, 83.50; the corresponding percentage moves are 5.8949%, 0.9680%, 5.6286%. Failed checks: p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen; wave 3 is shortest on the arithmetic comparison; wave 3 is shortest on the percentage comparison. Reject this specific ordinary upward candidate. Replacing its labels with a diagonal is unsupported without the diagonal’s own structure. The wider wave count remains unresolved; a Fibonacci match cannot repair these failures.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close | Test point, not a confirmed pivot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-16 | 1569.10 | 1569.10 | 1452.10 | 1485.90 | p0 = L = 1452.10 |
| 2020-03-17 | 1469.30 | 1537.70 | 1469.30 | 1524.90 | p1 = H = 1537.70 |
| 2020-03-18 | 1537.50 | 1542.00 | 1477.30 | 1477.30 | p2 = L = 1477.30 |
| 2020-03-19 | 1481.50 | 1491.60 | 1471.00 | 1478.60 | p3 = H = 1491.60 |
| 2020-03-20 | 1483.50 | 1484.00 | 1483.50 | 1484.00 | p4 = L = 1483.50 |
| 2020-03-23 | 1505.30 | 1567.00 | 1490.20 | 1567.00 | p5 = H = 1567.00 |
Do these six actual bars establish a valid completed five-wave impulse?
No. The stated candidate fails: p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen; wave 3 is shortest on the arithmetic comparison; wave 3 is shortest on the percentage comparison. Even a passing endpoint screen would still need internal subdivisions, confirmed pivots and larger-degree context.
Gold futures: snapshot on 25 October 2026 and conditional forecast review
The gold example uses the provider futures symbol GC=F, not XAUUSD or a gold ETF. As of 2026-10-25, the last available daily observation in Yahoo Finance GC=F is 2026-10-23, not a new Sunday quote. D1, USD per troy ounce. Last close 4007.90, previous close 4060.40, change -52.50. Dates follow America/New_York. These are quote OHLC, not verified official settlements; historical expiry/roll mechanics remain unverified.
The five-bar window gives H5=4211.20, L5=3989.10, width 222.10. During the next five completed provider bars, a close >4211.20 triggers continuation-versus-corrective-rally review; a close <3989.10 triggers deeper-correction/recount review. Inside the range, no branch is resolved. A range break alone supplies no confirmed wave-3/5 or A/B/C label. The protocol above governs order, deadline and the possibility of both events; no price target or trading signal is asserted.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 4185.00 | 4211.20 | 4155.60 | 4160.10 |
| 2026-10-20 | 4162.40 | 4174.90 | 4130.10 | 4142.60 |
| 2026-10-21 | 4143.40 | 4160.60 | 4122.30 | 4150.00 |
| 2026-10-22 | 4159.00 | 4164.30 | 4036.80 | 4060.40 |
| 2026-10-23 | 4042.20 | 4050.20 | 3989.10 | 4007.90 |
Does a future close above 4211.20 automatically confirm an impulse?
No. It satisfies only the predeclared review condition; the actual future observation and the wave structure must still be checked. It is not an entry instruction.
XAUUSD: real historical observations and a rejected candidate
XAUUSD is this provider’s OTC gold/dollar quotation; it is not the COMEX GC contract or a universal executable spot price. Source: ChartExchange, XAUUSD, D1, USD per ounce as quoted by the provider; 2026-10-11–2026-10-16. The shorter extract ends before the current snapshot. Provider date labels are retained; the published OHLC is not independently verified exchange data. The table tests the stated L,H,L,H,L,H candidate retrospectively; it is not a forecast issued on those dates.
For the candidate points, L1, L3, L5 = 32.3600, 23.5200, 87.5100; the corresponding percentage moves are 0.7733%, 0.5672%, 2.1286%. Failed checks: p2 is not above p0; p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen; wave 3 is shortest on the arithmetic comparison; wave 3 is shortest on the percentage comparison. Reject this specific ordinary upward candidate. Replacing its labels with a diagonal is unsupported without the diagonal’s own structure. The wider wave count remains unresolved; a Fibonacci match cannot repair these failures.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close | Test point, not a confirmed pivot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-11 | 4193.5900 | 4199.0300 | 4184.5500 | 4190.2700 | p0 = L = 4184.5500 |
| 2026-10-12 | 4190.4400 | 4216.9100 | 4154.6200 | 4170.5400 | p1 = H = 4216.9100 |
| 2026-10-13 | 4170.5400 | 4200.2400 | 4146.7000 | 4154.9000 | p2 = L = 4146.7000 |
| 2026-10-14 | 4154.7900 | 4170.2200 | 4073.3500 | 4111.6200 | p3 = H = 4170.2200 |
| 2026-10-15 | 4111.6700 | 4177.3500 | 4111.0900 | 4155.8100 | p4 = L = 4111.0900 |
| 2026-10-16 | 4155.5700 | 4198.6000 | 4146.9800 | 4163.8200 | p5 = H = 4198.6000 |
Do these six actual bars establish a valid completed five-wave impulse?
No. The stated candidate fails: p2 is not above p0; p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen; wave 3 is shortest on the arithmetic comparison; wave 3 is shortest on the percentage comparison. Even a passing endpoint screen would still need internal subdivisions, confirmed pivots and larger-degree context.
XAUUSD: snapshot on 25 October 2026 and conditional forecast review
XAUUSD is this provider’s OTC gold/dollar quotation; it is not the COMEX GC contract or a universal executable spot price. As of 2026-10-25, the last available daily observation in ChartExchange XAUUSD is 2026-10-23, not a new Sunday quote. D1, USD per ounce as quoted by the provider. Last close 3994.7700, previous close 4023.3900, change -28.6200. The table uses ChartExchange’s UTC-labelled dates and feed-bound OTC quotation. Bid/ask and session mechanics are not independently established; volume is omitted.
The five-bar window gives H5=4190.1700, L5=3975.5200, width 214.6500. During the next five completed provider bars, a close >4190.1700 triggers continuation-versus-corrective-rally review; a close <3975.5200 triggers deeper-correction/recount review. Inside the range, no branch is resolved. A range break alone supplies no confirmed wave-3/5 or A/B/C label. The protocol above governs order, deadline and the possibility of both events; no price target or trading signal is asserted.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 4184.6100 | 4190.1700 | 4131.3000 | 4132.1100 |
| 2026-10-20 | 4132.0700 | 4155.2900 | 4111.5500 | 4113.8400 |
| 2026-10-21 | 4113.7600 | 4142.0200 | 4104.8200 | 4125.1500 |
| 2026-10-22 | 4125.0400 | 4125.9200 | 4020.8900 | 4023.3900 |
| 2026-10-23 | 4023.4200 | 4033.7300 | 3975.5200 | 3994.7700 |
Does a future close above 4190.1700 automatically confirm an impulse?
No. It satisfies only the predeclared review condition; the actual future observation and the wave structure must still be checked. It is not an entry instruction.
Silver futures: real historical observations and a rejected candidate
The silver example uses the provider futures symbol SI=F, not XAGUSD or a silver ETF. Source: Yahoo Finance, SI=F, D1, USD per troy ounce; 2020-03-16–2020-03-23. Daily dates use America/New_York. The archive is a provider futures/index series, not a separately verified exchange record. The table tests the stated L,H,L,H,L,H candidate retrospectively; it is not a forecast issued on those dates.
For the candidate points, L1, L3, L5 = 0.860, 0.470, 1.145; the corresponding percentage moves are 7.2574%, 4.0051%, 9.4785%. Failed checks: p2 is not above p0; p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen; wave 3 is shortest on the arithmetic comparison; wave 3 is shortest on the percentage comparison. Reject this specific ordinary upward candidate. Replacing its labels with a diagonal is unsupported without the diagonal’s own structure. The wider wave count remains unresolved; a Fibonacci match cannot repair these failures.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close | Test point, not a confirmed pivot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-16 | 14.885 | 14.885 | 11.850 | 12.772 | p0 = L = 11.850 |
| 2020-03-17 | 12.550 | 12.710 | 12.415 | 12.469 | p1 = H = 12.710 |
| 2020-03-18 | 12.560 | 12.825 | 11.735 | 11.735 | p2 = L = 11.735 |
| 2020-03-19 | 12.070 | 12.205 | 11.895 | 12.097 | p3 = H = 12.205 |
| 2020-03-20 | 12.080 | 12.860 | 12.080 | 12.349 | p4 = L = 12.080 |
| 2020-03-23 | 12.900 | 13.225 | 12.900 | 13.225 | p5 = H = 13.225 |
Do these six actual bars establish a valid completed five-wave impulse?
No. The stated candidate fails: p2 is not above p0; p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen; wave 3 is shortest on the arithmetic comparison; wave 3 is shortest on the percentage comparison. Even a passing endpoint screen would still need internal subdivisions, confirmed pivots and larger-degree context.
Silver futures: snapshot on 25 October 2026 and conditional forecast review
The silver example uses the provider futures symbol SI=F, not XAGUSD or a silver ETF. As of 2026-10-25, the last available daily observation in Yahoo Finance SI=F is 2026-10-23, not a new Sunday quote. D1, USD per troy ounce. Last close 53.949, previous close 54.764, change -0.815. Dates follow America/New_York. These are quote OHLC, not verified official settlements; historical expiry/roll mechanics remain unverified.
The five-bar window gives H5=57.706, L5=53.075, width 4.631. During the next five completed provider bars, a close >57.706 triggers continuation-versus-corrective-rally review; a close <53.075 triggers deeper-correction/recount review. Inside the range, no branch is resolved. A range break alone supplies no confirmed wave-3/5 or A/B/C label. The protocol above governs order, deadline and the possibility of both events; no price target or trading signal is asserted.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 57.005 | 57.250 | 56.974 | 56.974 |
| 2026-10-20 | 56.740 | 57.706 | 56.740 | 57.706 |
| 2026-10-21 | 57.250 | 57.422 | 57.250 | 57.422 |
| 2026-10-22 | 57.000 | 57.000 | 54.390 | 54.764 |
| 2026-10-23 | 54.695 | 54.795 | 53.075 | 53.949 |
Does a future close above 57.706 automatically confirm an impulse?
No. It satisfies only the predeclared review condition; the actual future observation and the wave structure must still be checked. It is not an entry instruction.
XAGUSD: real historical observations and a rejected candidate
XAGUSD is this provider’s OTC silver/dollar quotation; it is not the COMEX SI contract or every broker’s CFD. Source: ChartExchange, XAGUSD, D1, USD per ounce as quoted by the provider; 2026-10-11–2026-10-16. The shorter extract ends before the current snapshot. Provider date labels are retained; the published OHLC is not independently verified exchange data. The table tests the stated L,H,L,H,L,H candidate retrospectively; it is not a forecast issued on those dates.
For the candidate points, L1, L3, L5 = 0.6830, 0.4720, 2.2970; the corresponding percentage moves are 1.1241%, 0.8015%, 4.1255%. Failed checks: p2 is not above p0; p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen; wave 3 is shortest on the arithmetic comparison; wave 3 is shortest on the percentage comparison. Reject this specific ordinary upward candidate. Replacing its labels with a diagonal is unsupported without the diagonal’s own structure. The wider wave count remains unresolved; a Fibonacci match cannot repair these failures.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close | Test point, not a confirmed pivot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-11 | 60.7962 | 61.0572 | 60.7612 | 60.9239 | p0 = L = 60.7612 |
| 2026-10-12 | 60.9239 | 61.4442 | 60.1312 | 60.2442 | p1 = H = 61.4442 |
| 2026-10-13 | 60.2432 | 60.7302 | 58.8882 | 58.9732 | p2 = L = 58.8882 |
| 2026-10-14 | 58.9722 | 59.3602 | 55.3892 | 55.7252 | p3 = H = 59.3602 |
| 2026-10-15 | 55.7302 | 57.5242 | 55.6782 | 57.0862 | p4 = L = 55.6782 |
| 2026-10-16 | 57.0862 | 57.9752 | 56.8862 | 56.9262 | p5 = H = 57.9752 |
Do these six actual bars establish a valid completed five-wave impulse?
No. The stated candidate fails: p2 is not above p0; p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen; wave 3 is shortest on the arithmetic comparison; wave 3 is shortest on the percentage comparison. Even a passing endpoint screen would still need internal subdivisions, confirmed pivots and larger-degree context.
XAGUSD: snapshot on 25 October 2026 and conditional forecast review
XAGUSD is this provider’s OTC silver/dollar quotation; it is not the COMEX SI contract or every broker’s CFD. As of 2026-10-25, the last available daily observation in ChartExchange XAGUSD is 2026-10-23, not a new Sunday quote. D1, USD per ounce as quoted by the provider. Last close 53.8492, previous close 54.5682, change -0.7190. The table uses ChartExchange’s UTC-labelled dates and feed-bound OTC quotation. Bid/ask and session mechanics are not independently established; volume is omitted.
The five-bar window gives H5=58.5972, L5=53.0152, width 5.5820. During the next five completed provider bars, a close >58.5972 triggers continuation-versus-corrective-rally review; a close <53.0152 triggers deeper-correction/recount review. Inside the range, no branch is resolved. A range break alone supplies no confirmed wave-3/5 or A/B/C label. The protocol above governs order, deadline and the possibility of both events; no price target or trading signal is asserted.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 57.3622 | 57.8492 | 56.8282 | 56.8822 |
| 2026-10-20 | 56.8762 | 58.5972 | 56.3791 | 57.7772 |
| 2026-10-21 | 57.7782 | 58.0362 | 56.9302 | 57.4682 |
| 2026-10-22 | 57.4682 | 57.6122 | 54.4702 | 54.5682 |
| 2026-10-23 | 54.5532 | 54.7265 | 53.0152 | 53.8492 |
Does a future close above 58.5972 automatically confirm an impulse?
No. It satisfies only the predeclared review condition; the actual future observation and the wave structure must still be checked. It is not an entry instruction.
WTI crude oil: real historical observations and a rejected candidate
CL=F refers to NYMEX WTI futures, not Brent or a broker’s USOIL cash CFD. Source: Yahoo Finance, CL=F, D1, USD per barrel; 2020-03-16–2020-03-23. Daily dates use America/New_York. The archive is a provider futures/index series, not a separately verified exchange record. The table tests the stated L,H,L,H,L,H candidate retrospectively; it is not a forecast issued on those dates.
For the candidate points, L1, L3, L5 = 2.20, 7.65, 4.61; the corresponding percentage moves are 7.8292%, 38.1356%, 23.6896%. Failed checks: p2 is not above p0; p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen. Reject this specific ordinary upward candidate. Replacing its labels with a diagonal is unsupported without the diagonal’s own structure. The wider wave count remains unresolved; a Fibonacci match cannot repair these failures.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close | Test point, not a confirmed pivot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-16 | 33.75 | 33.75 | 28.10 | 28.70 | p0 = L = 28.10 |
| 2020-03-17 | 28.69 | 30.30 | 26.63 | 26.95 | p1 = H = 30.30 |
| 2020-03-18 | 26.94 | 27.22 | 20.06 | 20.37 | p2 = L = 20.06 |
| 2020-03-19 | 22.30 | 27.71 | 21.36 | 25.22 | p3 = H = 27.71 |
| 2020-03-20 | 24.73 | 27.89 | 19.46 | 22.43 | p4 = L = 19.46 |
| 2020-03-23 | 22.52 | 24.07 | 20.80 | 23.36 | p5 = H = 24.07 |
Do these six actual bars establish a valid completed five-wave impulse?
No. The stated candidate fails: p2 is not above p0; p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen. Even a passing endpoint screen would still need internal subdivisions, confirmed pivots and larger-degree context.
WTI crude oil: snapshot on 25 October 2026 and conditional forecast review
CL=F refers to NYMEX WTI futures, not Brent or a broker’s USOIL cash CFD. As of 2026-10-25, the last available daily observation in Yahoo Finance CL=F is 2026-10-23, not a new Sunday quote. D1, USD per barrel. Last close 103.27, previous close 99.47, change 3.80. Dates follow America/New_York. These are quote OHLC, not verified official settlements; historical expiry/roll mechanics remain unverified.
The five-bar window gives H5=110.48, L5=96.26, width 14.22. During the next five completed provider bars, a close >110.48 triggers continuation-versus-corrective-rally review; a close <96.26 triggers deeper-correction/recount review. Inside the range, no branch is resolved. A range break alone supplies no confirmed wave-3/5 or A/B/C label. The protocol above governs order, deadline and the possibility of both events; no price target or trading signal is asserted.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 101.75 | 104.18 | 99.24 | 103.66 |
| 2026-10-20 | 103.43 | 110.48 | 101.04 | 101.79 |
| 2026-10-21 | 98.19 | 100.40 | 96.26 | 97.15 |
| 2026-10-22 | 97.78 | 100.17 | 97.72 | 99.47 |
| 2026-10-23 | 99.10 | 103.92 | 98.84 | 103.27 |
Does a future close above 110.48 automatically confirm an impulse?
No. It satisfies only the predeclared review condition; the actual future observation and the wave structure must still be checked. It is not an entry instruction.
Brent crude oil: real historical observations and a rejected candidate
BZ=F is NYMEX Brent Last Day Financial futures; it is not the ICE Brent BRN contract or a generic UKOIL CFD. Source: Yahoo Finance, BZ=F, D1, USD per barrel; 2020-03-16–2020-03-23. Daily dates use America/New_York. The archive is a provider futures/index series, not a separately verified exchange record. The table tests the stated L,H,L,H,L,H candidate retrospectively; it is not a forecast issued on those dates.
For the candidate points, L1, L3, L5 = 1.88, 4.87, 0.73; the corresponding percentage moves are 6.4076%, 19.8694%, 2.7249%. Failed checks: p2 is not above p0; p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen. Reject this specific ordinary upward candidate. Replacing its labels with a diagonal is unsupported without the diagonal’s own structure. The wider wave count remains unresolved; a Fibonacci match cannot repair these failures.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close | Test point, not a confirmed pivot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-16 | 34.46 | 34.55 | 29.34 | 30.05 | p0 = L = 29.34 |
| 2020-03-17 | 29.70 | 31.22 | 28.46 | 28.73 | p1 = H = 31.22 |
| 2020-03-18 | 28.66 | 29.19 | 24.51 | 24.88 | p2 = L = 24.51 |
| 2020-03-19 | 26.44 | 29.38 | 24.98 | 28.47 | p3 = H = 29.38 |
| 2020-03-20 | 28.00 | 30.93 | 26.79 | 26.98 | p4 = L = 26.79 |
| 2020-03-23 | 26.50 | 27.52 | 24.68 | 27.03 | p5 = H = 27.52 |
Do these six actual bars establish a valid completed five-wave impulse?
No. The stated candidate fails: p2 is not above p0; p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen. Even a passing endpoint screen would still need internal subdivisions, confirmed pivots and larger-degree context.
Brent crude oil: snapshot on 25 October 2026 and conditional forecast review
BZ=F is NYMEX Brent Last Day Financial futures; it is not the ICE Brent BRN contract or a generic UKOIL CFD. As of 2026-10-25, the last available daily observation in Yahoo Finance BZ=F is 2026-10-23, not a new Sunday quote. D1, USD per barrel. Last close 111.70, previous close 113.17, change -1.47. Dates follow America/New_York. These are quote OHLC, not verified official settlements; historical expiry/roll mechanics remain unverified.
The five-bar window gives H5=113.49, L5=105.95, width 7.54. During the next five completed provider bars, a close >113.49 triggers continuation-versus-corrective-rally review; a close <105.95 triggers deeper-correction/recount review. Inside the range, no branch is resolved. A range break alone supplies no confirmed wave-3/5 or A/B/C label. The protocol above governs order, deadline and the possibility of both events; no price target or trading signal is asserted.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 110.25 | 110.69 | 106.82 | 109.55 |
| 2026-10-20 | 109.13 | 111.97 | 105.95 | 108.79 |
| 2026-10-21 | 109.27 | 111.31 | 107.69 | 108.82 |
| 2026-10-22 | 109.92 | 113.49 | 109.73 | 113.17 |
| 2026-10-23 | 108.32 | 112.41 | 108.28 | 111.70 |
Does a future close above 113.49 automatically confirm an impulse?
No. It satisfies only the predeclared review condition; the actual future observation and the wave structure must still be checked. It is not an entry instruction.
Natural gas: real historical observations and a rejected candidate
NG=F refers to Henry Hub natural-gas futures; it is not European TTF gas or an LNG cargo assessment. Source: Yahoo Finance, NG=F, D1, USD per MMBtu; 2020-03-16–2020-03-23. Daily dates use America/New_York. The archive is a provider futures/index series, not a separately verified exchange record. The table tests the stated L,H,L,H,L,H candidate retrospectively; it is not a forecast issued on those dates.
For the candidate points, L1, L3, L5 = 0.042, 0.128, 0.054; the corresponding percentage moves are 2.3622%, 8.2315%, 3.4308%. Failed checks: p2 is not above p0; p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen. Reject this specific ordinary upward candidate. Replacing its labels with a diagonal is unsupported without the diagonal’s own structure. The wider wave count remains unresolved; a Fibonacci match cannot repair these failures.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close | Test point, not a confirmed pivot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-16 | 1.854 | 1.854 | 1.778 | 1.815 | p0 = L = 1.778 |
| 2020-03-17 | 1.797 | 1.820 | 1.711 | 1.729 | p1 = H = 1.820 |
| 2020-03-18 | 1.721 | 1.728 | 1.555 | 1.604 | p2 = L = 1.555 |
| 2020-03-19 | 1.632 | 1.683 | 1.602 | 1.654 | p3 = H = 1.683 |
| 2020-03-20 | 1.647 | 1.700 | 1.574 | 1.604 | p4 = L = 1.574 |
| 2020-03-23 | 1.533 | 1.628 | 1.519 | 1.602 | p5 = H = 1.628 |
Do these six actual bars establish a valid completed five-wave impulse?
No. The stated candidate fails: p2 is not above p0; p3 does not exceed p1; p4 is not above p1 under the strict non-overlap screen. Even a passing endpoint screen would still need internal subdivisions, confirmed pivots and larger-degree context.
Natural gas: snapshot on 25 October 2026 and conditional forecast review
NG=F refers to Henry Hub natural-gas futures; it is not European TTF gas or an LNG cargo assessment. As of 2026-10-25, the last available daily observation in Yahoo Finance NG=F is 2026-10-23, not a new Sunday quote. D1, USD per MMBtu. Last close 3.050, previous close 2.796, change 0.254. Dates follow America/New_York. These are quote OHLC, not verified official settlements; historical expiry/roll mechanics remain unverified.
The five-bar window gives H5=3.184, L5=2.726, width 0.458. During the next five completed provider bars, a close >3.184 triggers continuation-versus-corrective-rally review; a close <2.726 triggers deeper-correction/recount review. Inside the range, no branch is resolved. A range break alone supplies no confirmed wave-3/5 or A/B/C label. The protocol above governs order, deadline and the possibility of both events; no price target or trading signal is asserted.
| Date | Open | High | Low | Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 3.090 | 3.184 | 3.029 | 3.058 |
| 2026-10-20 | 3.043 | 3.046 | 2.957 | 2.963 |
| 2026-10-21 | 3.000 | 3.004 | 2.766 | 2.790 |
| 2026-10-22 | 2.780 | 2.838 | 2.726 | 2.796 |
| 2026-10-23 | 3.152 | 3.162 | 3.026 | 3.050 |
Does a future close above 3.184 automatically confirm an impulse?
No. It satisfies only the predeclared review condition; the actual future observation and the wave structure must still be checked. It is not an entry instruction.