Elliott waves in German indices: series, venue and timeframe
Published: (UTC+3)
Price and performance DAX, MDAX, SDAX and TecDAX with reproducible source checks before moving wave labels.
Elliott waves in German indices: series, venue and timeframeStudent Wyckoff · Elliott Wave
Understand money, read charts and test your conclusions.
Shown: 118
No results. Change your search or reset the filters.
Published: (UTC+3)
Price and performance DAX, MDAX, SDAX and TecDAX with reproducible source checks before moving wave labels.
Elliott waves in German indices: series, venue and timeframePublished: (UTC+3)
FDAX, FDXM, FDXS, FSMX and FTDX: point values, ticks, contract rolls and a transparent risk calculation.
Eurex DAX futures: contract, session and wave riskPublished: (UTC+3)
Document manual Elliott tools, degree and Fibonacci projections, then distinguish CFDs, warrants and knock-outs.
stock3 and DAX derivatives: check drawings and price sourcesPublished: (UTC+3)
Distinguish stock3, HKCM, Schulz Technical Analysis, Frank Schuh, Robby and Lirius; record subscription costs and test published scenarios.
German Elliott wave services: checking providers and analysesPublished: (UTC+3)
Identify German editions by Frost/Prechter, André Tiedje, Phantom/Florian Winter and Rüdiger Maaß; assess previews, VTAD, Campus and exercises.
Learning Elliott waves in German: books, editions and coursesPublished: (UTC+3)
Real historical daily bars: price constraints, rejected impulse candidates, gaps and unresolved subdivisions for four specific instruments.
Rheinmetall, SAP, Novo Nordisk and LINK: dated Elliott checksPublished: (UTC+3)
Bitcoin, ETH, Solana, XRP and BNB: real historical tests and a source snapshot of 25 October 2026, with unresolved wave structure.
Crypto Elliott analysis: source checks and dated casesPublished: (UTC+3)
Nine FX pairs and DXY: real reference-rate history, source-aware wave checks and a dated 25 October 2026 snapshot.
Forex and DXY: dated sources before wave labelsPublished: (UTC+3)
Real dated D1 observations for gold, silver, WTI, Brent and Henry Hub: reject mechanical counts and separate 25 October 2026 scenarios from historical examples.
Elliott analysis of metals, oil and gas: dated series laboratoryPublished: (UTC+3)
Dated S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, Dow, DAX, European and Asian index observations, with explicit sources, failed candidate counts and conditional next-bar reviews.
Elliott analysis of global indices: historical tests and 25 October 2026 reviewPublished: (UTC+3)
AAPL, TSLA, NVDA and MSFT: real OHLC, a 9 October replay cutoff, latest available bars and conditional scenarios without an invented complete count.
Apple, Tesla, NVIDIA and Microsoft stocks: real bars and the 25 October 2026 snapshotPublished: (UTC+3)
NinjaTrader, MotiveWave, Sierra Chart, Quantower, cTrader, ELWAVE, WaveBasis, EWI, ElliottWaveTrader and LuxAlgo under one evidence record.
Elliott platforms and services: compare the actual workflowPublished: (UTC+3)
Order blocks, sweeps, BOS/CHOCH and FVG under explicit conventions, without claiming institutional orders from candles.
SMC and Elliott: observations before labelsPublished: (UTC+3)
Teaching tables and diagrams with explicit inputs, formulas, seeds, local conditions and limits when checking Elliott wave hypotheses.
Oscillators and waves: from formula to testable conditionPublished: (UTC+3)
Teaching tables and diagrams with explicit inputs, formulas, seeds, local conditions and limits when checking Elliott wave hypotheses.
Averages, MACD, AO and EWO: reproducible wave checksPublished: (UTC+3)
Teaching tables and diagrams with explicit inputs, formulas, seeds, local conditions and limits when checking Elliott wave hypotheses.
ATR, DMI, ADX, Supertrend and SAR: range, direction and statePublished: (UTC+3)
Teaching tables and diagrams with explicit inputs, formulas, seeds, local conditions and limits when checking Elliott wave hypotheses.
Channels, Ichimoku and ZigZag: windows, shifts and availabilityPublished: (UTC+3)
Teaching tables and diagrams with explicit inputs, formulas, seeds, local conditions and limits when checking Elliott wave hypotheses.
OBV, VWAP and anchored VWAP: volume, weights and source boundariesPublished: (UTC+3)
Three educational examples for completed OHLC, confirmed pivots and six-point price checks.
Elliott data and code lab: MT4, MT5, Pine and PythonPublished: (UTC+3)
A toy neuron, chronological splits and candidate filtering with explicit limits.
AI and Elliott search: a validation protocolPublished: (UTC+3)
Head and shoulders, double extrema, flags, pennants, wedges and cups with handles: original numbers, cutoffs and separate test branches.
Chart patterns and Elliott: five testable outlinesPublished: (UTC+3)
Worked Gartley, Butterfly, Bat and Crab measurements with declared conventions, original data and a separate confirmation protocol.
Harmonic XABCD Patterns and Elliott: Check the MeasurementsPublished: (UTC+3)
Two calculated harmonic examples distinguish vertex labels from Elliott waves and separate pattern geometry from observed confirmation.
AB=CD and Three Drives: Geometry, Time and Elliott RolesPublished: (UTC+3)
Compare trade and tick volume, a fixed baseline, volume POC and TPO using fictional tables and diagrams.
Volume, Volume Profile and TPO alongside Elliott wavesPublished: (UTC+3)
Audit estimated delta, CVD resets, a chosen imbalance rule and OI versus volume with reproducible numbers.
Delta, CVD, footprints and open interest: check the sourcePublished: (UTC+3)
Examine ranges, springs, upthrusts and volume while independently checking wave structure.
Wyckoff and Elliott: test two hypotheses separatelyPublished: (UTC+3)
Calculate three rates from one origin and check a crossing using completed closes.
Gann and Elliott: price, time and fan scalePublished: (UTC+3)
Check two X-after-Flat characteristics under a specific attributed version without declaring a complete count.
NEoWave and Elliott: what the added conditions actually testPublished: (UTC+3)
Count nine Setup comparisons and separate them from Countdown and wave structure.
Sequential and Elliott: nine does not complete a wavePublished: (UTC+3)
Compare a declared Dow confirmation test with Elliott structure using two fictional examples and a reproducible research record.
Dow Theory and Elliott Waves: Separate the EvidencePublished: (UTC+3)
Support and resistance zones, a closing breakout rule, failed breakouts and retests in separate invented cases.
Price levels, breakouts and retests in an Elliott wave hypothesisPublished: (UTC+3)
Pin bars, engulfing and inside bars under explicit OHLC conventions, with separate wave and confirmation checks.
Candlestick patterns and Elliott waves: shape, condition and structurePublished: (UTC+3)
Separate the theory’s crowd-psychology narrative from price rules and test an interpretation with a synthetic chart and an observation checklist.
Elliott wave psychology: how to examine sentiment interpretationsPublished: (UTC+3)
Identify the originator of the Wave Principle and distinguish the books published in 1938, 1946 and 1978 before choosing an edition.
Elliott wave history: Ralph Nelson Elliott, Frost and PrechterPublished: (UTC+3)
Use a hypothetical 100-unit example to distinguish purchasing power from the shortcut of subtracting percentages.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Compare arithmetic and geometric averages, then test when the sequence of returns really changes capital.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Measure a decline from peak capital and calculate the gain needed to regain that peak.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Combine four hypothetical hourly candles and see which information a chart retains and which it loses.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Before comparing charts, check whether similar column names actually represent the same data.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Save the available facts, hypothesis and invalidation condition before you see the next part of the chart.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Separate a calculated index, a fund’s net assets and its traded share price with an original example.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Calculate two equally weighted assets and separate the number of names from common risk exposures.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Why an asset gain of 10% and a 5% fall in its currency produce 4.5%, not 5%.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
A hypothetical 5000 position funded by 1000 equity loses 10% of equity after a 2% price fall.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Equal money changes and equal percentage changes occupy different distances on a price axis.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Separate a return, a percentage-point gap and a ratio of ending wealth.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Separate a contract’s price move from the gap between expiries, then test what an additive history adjustment preserves.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Link returns between cash flows and test why a larger account balance is not the same as investment performance.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Calculate drifted weights, the amount to transfer and the minimum new contribution without selling.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Compare coupon rate, current yield and the yield of one promised payment exactly one year away.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Keep both values from one release, distinguish observation periods from publication and retrieval, and reconstruct the calculation known at the time.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Use five invented review cards to separate a plausible outline from evidence for the smaller structures.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Follow two independent invented cases and change the conclusion only when a new component record justifies it.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Measure the same invented pullback in four ways without confusing the units or declaring the pattern complete.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
An invented outcome ledger shows why 2 out of 4 and 2 out of 6 answer different questions and establish no trading profitability.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
An invented flat W, connector X and final triangle Y show why the internal ABC parts are not siblings of W and Y.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Two values displayed as 110.00 can lie on opposite sides of a wave boundary. Check retained prices rather than the number of printed decimals.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
A plan using existing lessons: each session leaves a short record, an answer you can explain and a defined next step.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Turn a broad software search into a practical choice: input data, working device, review method and access conditions.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Build a compact evidence record that connects an input chart, a proposed wave interpretation and the checks you actually completed.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
A practical sequence for checking chart data, selecting the range and preserving the result of an automatic calculation.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Use one input and one review sheet to distinguish a rejected interpretation, an unresolved interpretation and a supported hypothesis.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Check the required components, data and access without guessing hardware requirements or changing system protections.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Understand the browser interface, the required Windows module and the checkpoints for a complete chart-analysis session.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Compare the same working period, included route and practical requirements before deciding what a price means.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Match the product route to your data and equipment with three concrete scenarios and a short decision record.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Export the intended chart, check the downloaded file and preserve the exact history used for your wave review.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Use a small price-consistency exercise to catch the wrong dataset, a damaged row or an unexplained timestamp.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Practise three ordinary impulse price checks on invented price turning points, while keeping full structural confirmation separate.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Finish a first calculation with a usable input record, a reviewed candidate and a clear next question.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Separate the sampling interval of a chart from the structural level of a wave in a larger pattern.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Build a higher-degree-wave and subwave evidence sheet that exposes missing subdivisions rather than hiding them under a larger label.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Keep each interpretation, confirmation condition and rejection condition separate as new data arrives.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Tie a structural rejection level to an exact rule, price field and scenario instead of treating every marked line as the same kind of stop.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Compare two starting points without disguising a change of research question as a repeat calculation.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Separate an indicator running inside TradingView from chart export into the standalone Student Wyckoff Pro workflow.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Use one chart and a bounded checklist to evaluate access, the working route and the clarity of the result.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Record range boundaries in timestamps and preserve the context needed to compare two calculation sessions.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Distinguish a structural model from a simple wave interpretation of visible price bars with a small observation exercise.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Make a forecast reviewable by fixing the observation period, price condition and invalidation before the next price bars arrive.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Use a pattern-position worksheet to avoid applying a valid shape in an incompatible role.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Compare two versions of the same dataset without treating a corrected historical value as a new market event.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Work through an invented sequence where wave three is shorter than wave one but longer than wave five.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Calculate retracement levels from an invented movement and keep the anchor choice separate from the resulting numbers.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Practise rejecting a specific ordinary-impulse hypothesis without inventing a replacement pattern.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Separate exact rescaling of a drawing from evidence of nested wave structure.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Distinguish reproducibility, structural agreement and trading performance before evaluating a wave hypothesis.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Use a model-specific review sheet rather than applying one generic rule to every A-B-C label.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Review the difference between second and fourth waves without turning a tendency into an obligatory formula.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Turn a ratio-based idea into a reviewable research protocol without inventing performance results.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Calculate a three-point projection and show why changing the third anchor moves the result.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Distinguish a correction still in progress from a completed fourth wave and from a rejected ordinary impulse.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Calculate one projection while keeping the third-wave structural requirements independent of that ratio.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Use a stock-versus-benchmark worksheet without transferring wave boundaries or labels between different instruments.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Compare two explicit arithmetic projections while keeping equality guidelines separate from structural confirmation.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Separate a possible ending, an initial reversal candidate and a structure that still needs confirmation.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Keep a candidate first wave provisional and document the evidence that could support or reject it.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Distinguish a spot quotation, a dated futures contract, a continuous series and a gold fund before comparing wave interpretations.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Describe direction at two structural levels before calling a rally a new upward trend.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Keep the basic cycle and its smaller subdivisions on separate lines of a worksheet.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Use three review outcomes so missing evidence does not become a false approval or a false rejection.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
A practical India-focused preflight for local time, source time and the actual data workflow.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Separate the date of a chart extreme from the later moment when an indicator confirmed it.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Use two possible price paths to see why one candle can leave a wave sequence unresolved.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Check chart type, session and loaded history before attributing a disagreement to a wave algorithm.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Distinguish a closed market, an unavailable observation and a real price gap.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Measure which parts of an interpretation change when a documented parameter changes.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Translate upward examples into downward price relationships using an invented sequence.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Separate a wave scenario, a hypothetical fill and the arithmetic of a simulated transaction.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Train observation, rule selection and conclusion separately before looking at a completed interpretation.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Distinguish the market-analysis meaning of a wave from a repeating sine-wave cycle.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Compare arithmetic and logarithmic interpolation with the same positive-price anchors.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Do not treat a weekend, a missing observation and a slower wave as the same timing effect.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Distinguish a completed fifth that falls short from an unfinished movement that has not reached the prior extreme.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Separate a change in notation from a change in the proposed pattern and its evidence.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Use the failed ordinary impulse as a starting point for a separate diagonal review.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Keep the construction of a chart channel separate from the rule used to reject a wave hypothesis.
Read →Published: (UTC+3)
Identify the instrument and contract history before transferring wave labels between two DAX charts.
Read →