Student Wyckoff · Elliott Wave

Blog and practice

Forex and DXY: dated sources before wave labels

Nine FX pairs and DXY: real reference-rate history, source-aware wave checks and a dated 25 October 2026 snapshot.

Student Wyckoff editorial team

Published: (UTC+3)

Русский · English · Deutsch · Español · Français · Italiano · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어

A currency-pair name alone does not identify a broker candle, reference fixing, CFD or futures contract. These cases use explicitly identified series. Historical checks and the dated 25 October 2026 source snapshot are separate; the wave structure remains unresolved, and no trade or return is promised.

Forex: reference series, availability and the dated snapshot

Our source is the ECB’s daily euro reference-rate dataset, not broker OHLC, a bid/ask feed or an executable fixing. Rates are quoted as currency units per EUR. For A/B, calculate (B per EUR)/(A per EUR), with EUR per EUR=1. Cross-ratios are rounded to six decimals for this exercise; this is computational precision, not a market tick-size claim. The ECB publishes these rates for information and discourages transaction use.

The historical selection uses the first six alternating strict one-neighbour extrema in the March–May 2023 reference series. A local point needs the next published observation to qualify; the table gives that later date, not an invented intraday confirmation time. P0–P5 are candidate endpoints, with d=+1 for an upward candidate and d=−1 for downward. Check d×(P2−P0)>0, L3≥min(L1,L5) and d×(P4−P1)>0, where moving lengths are measured in the proposed direction. These necessary sampled-point checks do not establish 5–3–5–3–5 or replace source OHLC.

The 25 October 2026 snapshot was retrieved around 10:54:59 UTC. Its latest ECB observation is 23 October; no Sunday reference rate or Sunday broker quote is invented. Freeze U/D as the maximum/minimum of the latest five published observations and inspect the next three new publications. Above U/below D are chosen range events, not orders, promised direction or complete wave invalidation. Record both events if they occur, or expiry if neither does. Rebuild from the chosen broker’s own price basis and session before considering that separate source.

Forex: reference series, availability and the dated snapshot25 October 2026 review → last available ECB date 23 October → explicit currency ratio → unresolved wave structure.25 Oct review→23 Oct reference→Explicit ratio→Structure unresolved
25 October 2026 review → last available ECB date 23 October → explicit currency ratio → unresolved wave structure.
PairReference dateValueUpper ULower D
EURUSD2026-10-231.1193001.1234001.119300
GBPUSD2026-10-231.3368291.3401731.333056
USDJPY2026-10-23156.803359158.244989156.803359
AUDUSD2026-10-230.7022400.7034000.698493
USDCAD2026-10-231.3995351.4073941.399535
USDCHF2026-10-230.8243550.8250330.822044
NZDUSD2026-10-230.5686920.5692420.567148
EURJPY2026-10-23175.510000177.630000175.510000
GBPJPY2026-10-23209.619243211.583656209.619243

Is the 23 October reference value a live Sunday 25 October quote?

No. The snapshot date and observation date differ. The series is an informational reference fixing, not a live broker market.

EURUSD: real reference observations and a bounded scenario

For EURUSD, the unit is USD per EUR. The 23 October 2026 reference-based value is 1.1193/1=1.119300, using the ECB’s common EUR basis. This is a calculated reference ratio, not the price or session close of an unspecified EURUSD broker. Keep base/quote order unchanged; reversing a quote requires recomputation, not merely reversing an arrow.

The dated 2023 table supplies a rising six-point reference candidate, with moving lengths L1=0.006000, L3=0.019200, L5=0.033000. Result: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.006000≤0; the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-0.011600≤0. The sixth local point requires data through 2023-03-24; a backdated marker on the point’s own date is not proof of earlier availability. These results concern the chosen reference curve. They do not confirm another broker’s intraday structure or identify a unique larger-degree role.

For the fixed 25 October 2026 review, compare future published values with U=1.123400 and D=1.119300, the last-five reference range known from 23 October. During the next three new reference observations, value>U or value<D records only the chosen event. Structure remains unresolved. A reference series cannot show an intrabar stop/target sequence, spread, actual fill or a valid impulse merely because its next value crosses a boundary.

EURUSD: real reference observations and a bounded scenarioHistorical ECB-derived EURUSD reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.USD / EUR2023-03-02 → 2023-03-231.049821.060511.07121.081891.092580123452023-03-022023-03-23
Historical ECB-derived EURUSD reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.
RecordDateField / meaningValue
P02023-03-02reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-031.060500
P12023-03-07reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-081.066500
P22023-03-08reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-091.054500
P32023-03-14reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-151.073700
P42023-03-15reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-161.054900
P52023-03-23reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-241.087900
Dated snapshot2026-10-23reference ratio1.119300
U2026-10-19–2026-10-23maximum of five observations1.123400
D2026-10-19–2026-10-23minimum of five observations1.119300

Does this table validate a complete Elliott model on any broker’s chart?

No. For these supplied reference endpoints: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.006000≤0; the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-0.011600≤0. A complete model needs the relevant source, degree, position and internal evidence.

GBPUSD: real reference observations and a bounded scenario

For GBPUSD, the unit is USD per GBP. The 23 October 2026 reference-based value is 1.1193/0.83728=1.336829, using the ECB’s common EUR basis. This is a calculated reference ratio, not the price or session close of an unspecified GBPUSD broker. Keep base/quote order unchanged; reversing a quote requires recomputation, not merely reversing an arrow.

The dated 2023 table supplies a rising six-point reference candidate, with moving lengths L1=0.006714, L3=0.035518, L5=0.022501. Result: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.010612≤0. The sixth local point requires data through 2023-03-24; a backdated marker on the point’s own date is not proof of earlier availability. These results concern the chosen reference curve. They do not confirm another broker’s intraday structure or identify a unique larger-degree role.

For the fixed 25 October 2026 review, compare future published values with U=1.340173 and D=1.333056, the last-five reference range known from 23 October. During the next three new reference observations, value>U or value<D records only the chosen event. Structure remains unresolved. A reference series cannot show an intrabar stop/target sequence, spread, actual fill or a valid impulse merely because its next value crosses a boundary.

GBPUSD: real reference observations and a bounded scenarioHistorical ECB-derived GBPUSD reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.USD / GBP2023-03-02 → 2023-03-231.177531.191961.20641.220831.235260123452023-03-022023-03-23
Historical ECB-derived GBPUSD reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.
RecordDateField / meaningValue
P02023-03-02reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-031.194459
P12023-03-06reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-071.201173
P22023-03-08reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-091.183847
P32023-03-14reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-151.219365
P42023-03-16reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-171.206445
P52023-03-23reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-241.228946
Dated snapshot2026-10-23reference ratio1.336829
U2026-10-19–2026-10-23maximum of five observations1.340173
D2026-10-19–2026-10-23minimum of five observations1.333056

Does this table validate a complete Elliott model on any broker’s chart?

No. For these supplied reference endpoints: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.010612≤0. A complete model needs the relevant source, degree, position and internal evidence.

USDJPY: real reference observations and a bounded scenario

For USDJPY, the unit is JPY per USD. The 23 October 2026 reference-based value is 175.51/1.1193=156.803359, using the ECB’s common EUR basis. This is a calculated reference ratio, not the price or session close of an unspecified USDJPY broker. Keep base/quote order unchanged; reversing a quote requires recomputation, not merely reversing an arrow.

The dated 2023 table supplies a falling six-point reference candidate, with moving lengths L1=0.930730, L3=0.950824, L5=4.091425. Result: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.427467≤0; the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-0.826733≤0. The sixth local point requires data through 2023-03-14; a backdated marker on the point’s own date is not proof of earlier availability. These results concern the chosen reference curve. They do not confirm another broker’s intraday structure or identify a unique larger-degree role.

For the fixed 25 October 2026 review, compare future published values with U=158.244989 and D=156.803359, the last-five reference range known from 23 October. During the next three new reference observations, value>U or value<D records only the chosen event. Structure remains unresolved. A reference series cannot show an intrabar stop/target sequence, spread, actual fill or a valid impulse merely because its next value crosses a boundary.

USDJPY: real reference observations and a bounded scenarioHistorical ECB-derived USDJPY reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.JPY / USD2023-03-02 → 2023-03-13131.951133.431134.91136.389137.8690123452023-03-022023-03-13
Historical ECB-derived USDJPY reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.
RecordDateField / meaningValue
P02023-03-02reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-03136.793965
P12023-03-06reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-07135.863235
P22023-03-08reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-09137.221432
P32023-03-09reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-10136.270608
P42023-03-10reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-13136.689968
P52023-03-13reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-14132.598543
Dated snapshot2026-10-23reference ratio156.803359
U2026-10-19–2026-10-23maximum of five observations158.244989
D2026-10-19–2026-10-23minimum of five observations156.803359

Does this table validate a complete Elliott model on any broker’s chart?

No. For these supplied reference endpoints: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.427467≤0; the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-0.826733≤0. A complete model needs the relevant source, degree, position and internal evidence.

AUDUSD: real reference observations and a bounded scenario

For AUDUSD, the unit is USD per AUD. The 23 October 2026 reference-based value is 1.1193/1.5939=0.702240, using the ECB’s common EUR basis. This is a calculated reference ratio, not the price or session close of an unspecified AUDUSD broker. Keep base/quote order unchanged; reversing a quote requires recomputation, not merely reversing an arrow.

The dated 2023 table supplies a rising six-point reference candidate, with moving lengths L1=0.002560, L3=0.001101, L5=0.009900. Result: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.012381≤0; wave 3 is shortest: L3=0.001101<min(L1=0.002560,L5=0.009900); the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-0.015922≤0. The sixth local point requires data through 2023-03-15; a backdated marker on the point’s own date is not proof of earlier availability. These results concern the chosen reference curve. They do not confirm another broker’s intraday structure or identify a unique larger-degree role.

For the fixed 25 October 2026 review, compare future published values with U=0.703400 and D=0.698493, the last-five reference range known from 23 October. During the next three new reference observations, value>U or value<D records only the chosen event. Structure remains unresolved. A reference series cannot show an intrabar stop/target sequence, spread, actual fill or a valid impulse merely because its next value crosses a boundary.

AUDUSD: real reference observations and a bounded scenarioHistorical ECB-derived AUDUSD reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.USD / AUD2023-03-02 → 2023-03-140.656760.6618550.666950.6720450.677140123452023-03-022023-03-14
Historical ECB-derived AUDUSD reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.
RecordDateField / meaningValue
P02023-03-02reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-030.672351
P12023-03-03reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-060.674911
P22023-03-08reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-090.659970
P32023-03-09reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-100.661071
P42023-03-10reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-130.658989
P52023-03-14reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-150.668889
Dated snapshot2026-10-23reference ratio0.702240
U2026-10-19–2026-10-23maximum of five observations0.703400
D2026-10-19–2026-10-23minimum of five observations0.698493

Does this table validate a complete Elliott model on any broker’s chart?

No. For these supplied reference endpoints: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.012381≤0; wave 3 is shortest: L3=0.001101<min(L1=0.002560,L5=0.009900); the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-0.015922≤0. A complete model needs the relevant source, degree, position and internal evidence.

USDCAD: real reference observations and a bounded scenario

For USDCAD, the unit is CAD per USD. The 23 October 2026 reference-based value is 1.5665/1.1193=1.399535, using the ECB’s common EUR basis. This is a calculated reference ratio, not the price or session close of an unspecified USDCAD broker. Keep base/quote order unchanged; reversing a quote requires recomputation, not merely reversing an arrow.

The dated 2023 table supplies a falling six-point reference candidate, with moving lengths L1=0.002319, L3=0.015169, L5=0.008362. Result: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.020866≤0; the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-0.014860≤0. The sixth local point requires data through 2023-03-22; a backdated marker on the point’s own date is not proof of earlier availability. These results concern the chosen reference curve. They do not confirm another broker’s intraday structure or identify a unique larger-degree role.

For the fixed 25 October 2026 review, compare future published values with U=1.407394 and D=1.399535, the last-five reference range known from 23 October. During the next three new reference observations, value>U or value<D records only the chosen event. Structure remains unresolved. A reference series cannot show an intrabar stop/target sequence, spread, actual fill or a valid impulse merely because its next value crosses a boundary.

USDCAD: real reference observations and a bounded scenarioHistorical ECB-derived USDCAD reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.CAD / USD2023-03-02 → 2023-03-211.356811.364231.371651.379071.386490123452023-03-022023-03-21
Historical ECB-derived USDCAD reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.
RecordDateField / meaningValue
P02023-03-02reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-031.362376
P12023-03-03reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-061.360057
P22023-03-10reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-131.383242
P32023-03-14reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-151.368073
P42023-03-15reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-161.374917
P52023-03-21reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-221.366555
Dated snapshot2026-10-23reference ratio1.399535
U2026-10-19–2026-10-23maximum of five observations1.407394
D2026-10-19–2026-10-23minimum of five observations1.399535

Does this table validate a complete Elliott model on any broker’s chart?

No. For these supplied reference endpoints: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.020866≤0; the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-0.014860≤0. A complete model needs the relevant source, degree, position and internal evidence.

USDCHF: real reference observations and a bounded scenario

For USDCHF, the unit is CHF per USD. The 23 October 2026 reference-based value is 0.9227/1.1193=0.824355, using the ECB’s common EUR basis. This is a calculated reference ratio, not the price or session close of an unspecified USDCHF broker. Keep base/quote order unchanged; reversing a quote requires recomputation, not merely reversing an arrow.

The dated 2023 table supplies a falling six-point reference candidate, with moving lengths L1=0.008018, L3=0.031069, L5=0.011633. Result: all three sampled-point checks pass, but subdivisions and true intraday extremes are not established. The sixth local point requires data through 2023-03-24; a backdated marker on the point’s own date is not proof of earlier availability. These results concern the chosen reference curve. They do not confirm another broker’s intraday structure or identify a unique larger-degree role.

For the fixed 25 October 2026 review, compare future published values with U=0.825033 and D=0.822044, the last-five reference range known from 23 October. During the next three new reference observations, value>U or value<D records only the chosen event. Structure remains unresolved. A reference series cannot show an intrabar stop/target sequence, spread, actual fill or a valid impulse merely because its next value crosses a boundary.

USDCHF: real reference observations and a bounded scenarioHistorical ECB-derived USDCHF reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.CHF / USD2023-03-02 → 2023-03-230.9063480.9163050.9262620.9362190.9461760123452023-03-022023-03-23
Historical ECB-derived USDCHF reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.
RecordDateField / meaningValue
P02023-03-02reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-030.941820
P12023-03-07reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-080.933802
P22023-03-08reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-090.941773
P32023-03-13reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-140.910704
P42023-03-17reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-200.927986
P52023-03-23reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-240.916353
Dated snapshot2026-10-23reference ratio0.824355
U2026-10-19–2026-10-23maximum of five observations0.825033
D2026-10-19–2026-10-23minimum of five observations0.822044

Does this table validate a complete Elliott model on any broker’s chart?

No. For these supplied reference endpoints: all three sampled-point checks pass, but subdivisions and true intraday extremes are not established. A complete model needs the relevant source, degree, position and internal evidence.

NZDUSD: real reference observations and a bounded scenario

For NZDUSD, the unit is USD per NZD. The 23 October 2026 reference-based value is 1.1193/1.9682=0.568692, using the ECB’s common EUR basis. This is a calculated reference ratio, not the price or session close of an unspecified NZDUSD broker. Keep base/quote order unchanged; reversing a quote requires recomputation, not merely reversing an arrow.

The dated 2023 table supplies a rising six-point reference candidate, with moving lengths L1=0.000149, L3=0.000877, L5=0.012126. Result: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.010151≤0; the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-0.009697≤0. The sixth local point requires data through 2023-03-15; a backdated marker on the point’s own date is not proof of earlier availability. These results concern the chosen reference curve. They do not confirm another broker’s intraday structure or identify a unique larger-degree role.

For the fixed 25 October 2026 review, compare future published values with U=0.569242 and D=0.567148, the last-five reference range known from 23 October. During the next three new reference observations, value>U or value<D records only the chosen event. Structure remains unresolved. A reference series cannot show an intrabar stop/target sequence, spread, actual fill or a valid impulse merely because its next value crosses a boundary.

NZDUSD: real reference observations and a bounded scenarioHistorical ECB-derived NZDUSD reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.USD / NZD2023-03-02 → 2023-03-140.6098060.6138790.6179530.6220260.6260990123452023-03-022023-03-14
Historical ECB-derived NZDUSD reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.
RecordDateField / meaningValue
P02023-03-02reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-030.621739
P12023-03-03reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-060.621888
P22023-03-08reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-090.611588
P32023-03-09reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-100.612465
P42023-03-10reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-130.612191
P52023-03-14reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-150.624317
Dated snapshot2026-10-23reference ratio0.568692
U2026-10-19–2026-10-23maximum of five observations0.569242
D2026-10-19–2026-10-23minimum of five observations0.567148

Does this table validate a complete Elliott model on any broker’s chart?

No. For these supplied reference endpoints: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.010151≤0; the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-0.009697≤0. A complete model needs the relevant source, degree, position and internal evidence.

EURJPY: real reference observations and a bounded scenario

For EURJPY, the unit is JPY per EUR. The 23 October 2026 reference-based value is 175.51/1=175.510000, using the ECB’s common EUR basis. This is a calculated reference ratio, not the price or session close of an unspecified EURJPY broker. Keep base/quote order unchanged; reversing a quote requires recomputation, not merely reversing an arrow.

The dated 2023 table supplies a falling six-point reference candidate, with moving lengths L1=0.520000, L3=1.390000, L5=2.740000. Result: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.140000≤0; the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-0.150000≤0. The sixth local point requires data through 2023-03-14; a backdated marker on the point’s own date is not proof of earlier availability. These results concern the chosen reference curve. They do not confirm another broker’s intraday structure or identify a unique larger-degree role.

For the fixed 25 October 2026 review, compare future published values with U=177.630000 and D=175.510000, the last-five reference range known from 23 October. During the next three new reference observations, value>U or value<D records only the chosen event. Structure remains unresolved. A reference series cannot show an intrabar stop/target sequence, spread, actual fill or a valid impulse merely because its next value crosses a boundary.

EURJPY: real reference observations and a bounded scenarioHistorical ECB-derived EURJPY reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.JPY / EUR2023-03-02 → 2023-03-13141.505142.545143.585144.625145.6650123452023-03-022023-03-13
Historical ECB-derived EURJPY reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.
RecordDateField / meaningValue
P02023-03-02reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-03145.070000
P12023-03-03reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-06144.550000
P22023-03-07reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-08145.210000
P32023-03-09reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-10143.820000
P42023-03-10reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-13144.700000
P52023-03-13reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-14141.960000
Dated snapshot2026-10-23reference ratio175.510000
U2026-10-19–2026-10-23maximum of five observations177.630000
D2026-10-19–2026-10-23minimum of five observations175.510000

Does this table validate a complete Elliott model on any broker’s chart?

No. For these supplied reference endpoints: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.140000≤0; the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-0.150000≤0. A complete model needs the relevant source, degree, position and internal evidence.

GBPJPY: real reference observations and a bounded scenario

For GBPJPY, the unit is JPY per GBP. The 23 October 2026 reference-based value is 175.51/0.83728=209.619243, using the ECB’s common EUR basis. This is a calculated reference ratio, not the price or session close of an unspecified GBPJPY broker. Keep base/quote order unchanged; reversing a quote requires recomputation, not merely reversing an arrow.

The dated 2023 table supplies a rising six-point reference candidate, with moving lengths L1=0.020682, L3=2.017214, L5=2.995470. Result: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-1.261377≤0; the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-2.573236≤0. The sixth local point requires data through 2023-03-15; a backdated marker on the point’s own date is not proof of earlier availability. These results concern the chosen reference curve. They do not confirm another broker’s intraday structure or identify a unique larger-degree role.

For the fixed 25 October 2026 review, compare future published values with U=211.583656 and D=209.619243, the last-five reference range known from 23 October. During the next three new reference observations, value>U or value<D records only the chosen event. Structure remains unresolved. A reference series cannot show an intrabar stop/target sequence, spread, actual fill or a valid impulse merely because its next value crosses a boundary.

GBPJPY: real reference observations and a bounded scenarioHistorical ECB-derived GBPJPY reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.JPY / GBP2023-03-06 → 2023-03-14160.18161.238162.297163.356164.4140123452023-03-062023-03-14
Historical ECB-derived GBPJPY reference points, with later local-confirmation dates in the table. These are reference observations, not OHLC or current quotes.
RecordDateField / meaningValue
P02023-03-06reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-07163.195306
P12023-03-07reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-08163.215988
P22023-03-09reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-10161.933929
P32023-03-10reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-13163.951143
P42023-03-13reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-14160.642752
P52023-03-14reference; next-observation qualification 2023-03-15163.638222
Dated snapshot2026-10-23reference ratio209.619243
U2026-10-19–2026-10-23maximum of five observations211.583656
D2026-10-19–2026-10-23minimum of five observations209.619243

Does this table validate a complete Elliott model on any broker’s chart?

No. For these supplied reference endpoints: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-1.261377≤0; the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-2.573236≤0. A complete model needs the relevant source, degree, position and internal evidence.

DXY: the index, actual history and a separate vendor snapshot

ICE describes DXY as a geometric six-currency index; the EUR weight is 57.60%. It is not EURUSD, a broad-dollar index with another basket, DX futures or a broker CFD. Holding the other components fixed, an assumed 1% rise in EURUSD implies a factor 1.01^(−0.576)≈0.994285 for DXY, about−0.5715%. This is our isolated arithmetic exercise, not an actual market prediction or proof that every USD pair must move together.

For a real historical example, ICE’s May 2024 article reports closing 89.32 on 6 January 2021, 114.24 on 27 September 2022 and 99.75 on 13 July 2023. The changes between these landmarks are+24.92 and−14.49 index points. Three dated landmarks do not determine five waves, subdivisions or the intervening extrema. Retain the historical question as unresolved rather than drawing missing waves from three values.

Separate dated snapshot: on 25 October 2026 around 10:54:59 UTC, the Yahoo data vendor returned DX-Y.NYB with instrument type INDEX. Its last nonempty daily observation was 23 October, close 101.81. The empty 25 October row is excluded. Using values rounded to two decimals as an explicit research convention, the latest-five range is D=101.61 to U=101.98. Compare the next three valid daily provider closes with those bounds; no actual future branch or wave structure is established. This vendor snapshot is not an ICE-certified live fixing, futures execution or interchangeable continuation of the three ICE historical landmarks.

DXY: the index, actual history and a separate vendor snapshotThree historical ICE DXY closing landmarks,2021–2023. The 2026 Yahoo vendor observation is separately identified in the table and is not joined to this historical line.Index points2021-01-06 → 2023-07-1385.831293.8056101.78109.754117.729t0t1t22021-01-062023-07-13
Three historical ICE DXY closing landmarks,2021–2023. The 2026 Yahoo vendor observation is separately identified in the table and is not joined to this historical line.
RecordDateField / meaningValue
t02021-01-06ICE DXY89.32
t12022-09-27ICE DXY114.24
t22023-07-13ICE DXY99.75
Dated snapshot2026-10-23Yahoo DX-Y.NYB101.81
U2026-10-19–2026-10-23maximum of five observations101.98
D2026-10-19–2026-10-23minimum of five observations101.61

Do three historical index closes prove a completed five-wave structure?

No. They provide three dated price facts. Intermediate structure, source-specific extremes and a complete wave interpretation are still missing.

Sources and limits