Crypto Elliott analysis: source checks and dated cases
Bitcoin, ETH, Solana, XRP and BNB: real historical tests and a source snapshot of 25 October 2026, with unresolved wave structure.
Published: (UTC+3)
Русский · English · Deutsch · Español · Français · Italiano · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
This teaching review separates historical price facts, candidate wave labels and a dated source snapshot. It does not present a live trading signal. The snapshot was requested on 25 October 2026 at 10:54:58 UTC and retrieved by 10:54:59 UTC. It is a fixed record, not an automatically refreshed quotation page.
Cryptocurrency: market identity and the 25 October 2026 snapshot
A ticker is not a complete data specification. Here the source is Bybit Spot, quote currency USDT, daily bars with UTC start dates. The API category is explicitly spot: the documented default is linear when category is omitted. Spot candles, a derivative’s traded price, mark price and index price are different series. USDT per coin is not automatically a USD cash price.
The table records the last completed UTC day,24 October 2026, using responses retrieved on 25 October 2026 at 10:54:58–10:54:59 UTC. The 25 October bar was still open and is excluded from completed-bar calculations. C is the completed close, H/L its extremes. This records available source observations; it establishes neither market-wide prices nor a fully confirmed Elliott count.
For the following scenario exercises, fix U=that completed day’s H and D=its L. Observe the next three newly completed UTC daily closes after the snapshot. A close above U records an upward range event; below D records a downward event. These are chosen research conditions, not wave validation or execution. If both occur, retain their order; if neither occurs, record expiry. Save the source and alternatives before revealing those new days.
| Market | Last completed UTC day | C | H | L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTCUSDT | 2026-10-24 | 80884.1 | 81212.8 | 79217.9 |
| ETHUSDT | 2026-10-24 | 2358.78 | 2390.34 | 2282.77 |
| SOLUSDT | 2026-10-24 | 102.37 | 103.11 | 98.62 |
| XRPUSDT | 2026-10-24 | 1.2997 | 1.3015 | 1.2546 |
| BNBUSDT | 2026-10-24 | 739.94 | 741.44 | 717.7 |
Does the open 25 October bar provide a completed daily close?
No. Its last traded price may change. This snapshot uses the completed 24 October UTC bar and does not infer a finished wave from it.
Bitcoin / BTCUSDT: a dated snapshot alongside the existing real lesson
The existing Bitcoin lesson already provides real Bybit Spot BTCUSDT daily bars, six dated endpoints, numerical price checks and an alternative for March–April 2023. Follow its source link rather than replacing that history with invented BTC prices. Those retrospective labels do not establish a count for 25 October 2026.
Dated record for Bitcoin / BTCUSDT, as available on 25 October 2026 around 10:54:59 UTC: the last completed UTC day is 24 October, with O=81191, H=81212.8, L=79217.9, C=80884.1, in USDT per base coin. Freeze U=81212.8 and D=79217.9. A subsequent completed close above U or below D during the next three completed days meets only the selected range condition; the current wave role and subdivisions remain unresolved.
Bitcoin is the asset; BTCUSDT here identifies the chosen spot pair and venue. Do not merge its points with BTCUSD futures, mark prices or another exchange. A frozen range threshold is neither a complete Elliott invalidation boundary nor a stop order; a source-level event alone gives no fill or profitable forecast.
| Record | Date | Field / meaning | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | O | 81191 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | H | 81212.8 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | L | 79217.9 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | C | 80884.1 |
| U | 2026-10-24 | H | 81212.8 |
| D | 2026-10-24 | L | 79217.9 |
Can the 2023 count be carried directly into the 2026 snapshot?
No. It is a different data window. Preserve the historical case and investigate the new observations, degree and subdivisions independently.
Ethereum / ETHUSDT: a real candidate that fails ordinary-impulse checks
Use the six real Bybit Spot H/L observations in the table, on the manually selected dates 10, 14, 15, 22, 27 March and 14 April 2023. Treat P0–P5 as a retrospective upward candidate, d=+1, not a uniquely detected real-time count. Its moving lengths are L1=408.14, L3=208.57, L5=441.72. The concrete failed checks are: wave 3 is shortest: L3=208.57<min(L1=408.14,L5=441.72); the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-90.64≤0. This particular ordinary-impulse candidate is rejected; do not rescue it by renaming the asset or ignoring an extreme.
Dated record for Ethereum / ETHUSDT, as available on 25 October 2026 around 10:54:59 UTC: the last completed UTC day is 24 October, with O=2387.68, H=2390.34, L=2282.77, C=2358.78, in USDT per base coin. Freeze U=2390.34 and D=2282.77. A subsequent completed close above U or below D during the next three completed days meets only the selected range condition; the current wave role and subdivisions remain unresolved.
The historical cutoff is 14 April 2023; endpoint selection is retrospective, with no claim that these endpoints were known on their bar dates. Price failure rejects this selected candidate, not every Elliott interpretation of the asset. A corrective or diagonal alternative must be examined afresh with its own position and subdivisions. The current snapshot is a separate window, not evidence of the historical count’s predictive skill.
| Record | Date | Field / meaning | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | 2023-03-10 | L | 1369.37 |
| P1 | 2023-03-14 | H | 1777.51 |
| P2 | 2023-03-15 | L | 1610.86 |
| P3 | 2023-03-22 | H | 1819.43 |
| P4 | 2023-03-27 | L | 1686.87 |
| P5 | 2023-04-14 | H | 2128.59 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | O | 2387.68 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | H | 2390.34 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | L | 2282.77 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | C | 2358.78 |
Does this selected six-point candidate establish an ordinary impulse?
No. Its specific failed tests are wave 3 is shortest: L3=208.57<min(L1=408.14,L5=441.72); the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-90.64≤0. Alternative structure and the current window remain separate questions.
Solana / SOLUSDT: a real candidate that fails ordinary-impulse checks
Use the six real Bybit Spot H/L observations in the table, on the manually selected dates 10, 14, 15, 22, 27 March and 14 April 2023. Treat P0–P5 as a retrospective upward candidate, d=+1, not a uniquely detected real-time count. Its moving lengths are L1=6.10, L3=4.37, L5=6.16. The concrete failed checks are: wave 3 is shortest: L3=4.37<min(L1=6.10,L5=6.16); the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-2.78≤0. This particular ordinary-impulse candidate is rejected; do not rescue it by renaming the asset or ignoring an extreme.
Dated record for Solana / SOLUSDT, as available on 25 October 2026 around 10:54:59 UTC: the last completed UTC day is 24 October, with O=102.85, H=103.11, L=98.62, C=102.37, in USDT per base coin. Freeze U=103.11 and D=98.62. A subsequent completed close above U or below D during the next three completed days meets only the selected range condition; the current wave role and subdivisions remain unresolved.
The historical cutoff is 14 April 2023; endpoint selection is retrospective, with no claim that these endpoints were known on their bar dates. Price failure rejects this selected candidate, not every Elliott interpretation of the asset. A corrective or diagonal alternative must be examined afresh with its own position and subdivisions. The current snapshot is a separate window, not evidence of the historical count’s predictive skill.
| Record | Date | Field / meaning | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | 2023-03-10 | L | 16.01 |
| P1 | 2023-03-14 | H | 22.11 |
| P2 | 2023-03-15 | L | 18.71 |
| P3 | 2023-03-22 | H | 23.08 |
| P4 | 2023-03-27 | L | 19.33 |
| P5 | 2023-04-14 | H | 25.49 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | O | 102.85 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | H | 103.11 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | L | 98.62 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | C | 102.37 |
Does this selected six-point candidate establish an ordinary impulse?
No. Its specific failed tests are wave 3 is shortest: L3=4.37<min(L1=6.10,L5=6.16); the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-2.78≤0. Alternative structure and the current window remain separate questions.
XRP / XRPUSDT: a real candidate that fails ordinary-impulse checks
Use the six real Bybit Spot H/L observations in the table, on the manually selected dates 10, 14, 15, 22, 27 March and 14 April 2023. Treat P0–P5 as a retrospective upward candidate, d=+1, not a uniquely detected real-time count. Its moving lengths are L1=0.0299, L3=0.1189, L5=0.1038. The concrete failed checks are: the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.0011≤0. This particular ordinary-impulse candidate is rejected; do not rescue it by renaming the asset or ignoring an extreme.
Dated record for XRP / XRPUSDT, as available on 25 October 2026 around 10:54:59 UTC: the last completed UTC day is 24 October, with O=1.2951, H=1.3015, L=1.2546, C=1.2997, in USDT per base coin. Freeze U=1.3015 and D=1.2546. A subsequent completed close above U or below D during the next three completed days meets only the selected range condition; the current wave role and subdivisions remain unresolved.
The historical cutoff is 14 April 2023; endpoint selection is retrospective, with no claim that these endpoints were known on their bar dates. Price failure rejects this selected candidate, not every Elliott interpretation of the asset. A corrective or diagonal alternative must be examined afresh with its own position and subdivisions. The current snapshot is a separate window, not evidence of the historical count’s predictive skill.
| Record | Date | Field / meaning | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | 2023-03-10 | L | 0.3571 |
| P1 | 2023-03-14 | H | 0.387 |
| P2 | 2023-03-15 | L | 0.356 |
| P3 | 2023-03-22 | H | 0.4749 |
| P4 | 2023-03-27 | L | 0.4427 |
| P5 | 2023-04-14 | H | 0.5465 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | O | 1.2951 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | H | 1.3015 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | L | 1.2546 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | C | 1.2997 |
Does this selected six-point candidate establish an ordinary impulse?
No. Its specific failed tests are the origin test fails: d×(P2−P0)=-0.0011≤0. Alternative structure and the current window remain separate questions.
BNB / BNBUSDT: a real candidate that fails ordinary-impulse checks
Use the six real Bybit Spot H/L observations in the table, on the manually selected dates 10, 14, 15, 22, 27 March and 14 April 2023. Treat P0–P5 as a retrospective upward candidate, d=+1, not a uniquely detected real-time count. Its moving lengths are L1=54.1143, L3=38.8619, L5=29.9206. The concrete failed checks are: the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-13.9031≤0. This particular ordinary-impulse candidate is rejected; do not rescue it by renaming the asset or ignoring an extreme.
Dated record for BNB / BNBUSDT, as available on 25 October 2026 around 10:54:59 UTC: the last completed UTC day is 24 October, with O=739.67, H=741.44, L=717.7, C=739.94, in USDT per base coin. Freeze U=741.44 and D=717.7. A subsequent completed close above U or below D during the next three completed days meets only the selected range condition; the current wave role and subdivisions remain unresolved.
The historical cutoff is 14 April 2023; endpoint selection is retrospective, with no claim that these endpoints were known on their bar dates. Price failure rejects this selected candidate, not every Elliott interpretation of the asset. A corrective or diagonal alternative must be examined afresh with its own position and subdivisions. The current snapshot is a separate window, not evidence of the historical count’s predictive skill.
| Record | Date | Field / meaning | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | 2023-03-10 | L | 265.1681 |
| P1 | 2023-03-14 | H | 319.2824 |
| P2 | 2023-03-15 | L | 300.3356 |
| P3 | 2023-03-22 | H | 339.1975 |
| P4 | 2023-03-27 | L | 305.3793 |
| P5 | 2023-04-14 | H | 335.2999 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | O | 739.67 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | H | 741.44 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | L | 717.7 |
| Dated snapshot | 2026-10-24 | C | 739.94 |
Does this selected six-point candidate establish an ordinary impulse?
No. Its specific failed tests are the non-overlap test fails: d×(P4−P1)=-13.9031≤0. Alternative structure and the current window remain separate questions.
Bitcoin 2025: reject one candidate using real dated prices
This is a separate retrospective 2025 case, not the 2023 lesson or the 2026 snapshot. The source is Bybit Spot BTCUSDT, D1 UTC, in USDT per BTC. The saved response contains 92 daily bars for March–May 2025. Six dates were selected manually; the candidate below uses only observations through 22 May 2025. The selection is not claimed to have been published or known as a finished count in 2025.
Propose these points as upward endpoints 0–5. P2=74500 on 7 April is below P0=76589.78 on 11 March, so the same ordinary-impulse candidate fails its origin condition. The moving lengths L1=11940.82, L3=20226.2 and L5=19084.5 do not repair that failure. Passing a different check is not permission to ignore the rejected second-wave role. The point dates and H/L fields are facts from this spot source; wave numbers are the hypothesis.
Reject this specific interpretation and investigate any different boundary, degree or corrective model afresh. Neither a complete count for all of 2025 nor predictive skill follows from the later rise. Keep the original candidate, source window and reason for rejection; do not rename the failed point after seeing the answer. The dated 2026 record elsewhere in this article remains a different analysis window.
| Candidate point | UTC date | Field | USDT per BTC |
|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | 2025-03-11 | L | 76589.78 |
| P1 | 2025-03-25 | H | 88530.6 |
| P2 | 2025-04-07 | L | 74500 |
| P3 | 2025-04-23 | H | 94726.2 |
| P4 | 2025-04-30 | L | 92914.5 |
| P5 | 2025-05-22 | H | 111999 |
Does the later high 111999 restore the rejected ordinary impulse?
No. P2 fell below the selected origin. A later higher price does not repair that model violation.