Sequential and Elliott: nine does not complete a wave
Count nine Setup comparisons and separate them from Countdown and wave structure.
Published: (UTC+3)
Русский · English · Deutsch · Español · Français · Italiano · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
All numbers and scenarios below are invented. These exercises check observations and rules; they report no measured return or promised reversal. O/H/L/C mean open/high/low/close; V is volume from the chosen source.
Sequential counts and Elliott structure ask different questions
DeMARK Sequential uses Setup and Countdown phases. Its public Buy Setup definition requires nine consecutive C(t)<C(t−4); Sell Setup uses >. Countdown compares the close with the high/low two bars earlier and need not be consecutive. Our table illustrates only Buy Setup’s arithmetic core: after C4=104≥C0=100, bars 5–13 give nine strict comparisons. “Buy” is a method label, not a purchase recommendation.
Bar 14 closes 91, continuing lower after nine. In an alternative history, replacing C9=96 with 100 gives C9=C5, interrupting the strict sequence. Closes alone cannot establish perfection, TDST or Countdown; the full indicator also handles deferral, recycling and cancellation of incomplete Countdowns under its rules. Freeze version, start, OHLC and criteria before replay; compare available labels with an independent Elliott count. Numbers 9/13 do not correspond to waves 1–5 or establish reversal or profitability.
| t | C(t) | C(t−4) | n |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100 | — | — |
| 1 | 101 | — | — |
| 2 | 102 | — | — |
| 3 | 103 | — | — |
| 4 | 104 | 100 | — |
| 5 | 100 | 101 | 1 |
| 6 | 99 | 102 | 2 |
| 7 | 98 | 103 | 3 |
| 8 | 97 | 104 | 4 |
| 9 | 96 | 100 | 5 |
| 10 | 95 | 99 | 6 |
| 11 | 94 | 98 | 7 |
| 12 | 93 | 97 | 8 |
| 13 | 92 | 96 | 9 |
| 14 | 91 | 95 | — |
Does this table establish a completed Countdown 13?
No. It checks nine Setup close comparisons; the high/low data and full Countdown protocol are absent.